Back to Home

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,
CUSTOM HOUSE, CHENNAI.

PUBLIC NOTICE NO .  118   /2001

 

Sub: Regarding inclusion of ship demurrage charge in Valuation of Goods.

 

******

                                     

Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue,  New Delhi, Circular No.14/2001-Cus.V, vide F.No.467/25/2000-CUS.V dated 02.03.2001, is reproduced below for the guidance of the importers, Clearing Agents and Trading Public.

 

C11/15/2001-AP (PORT)                                          (S. SANKARAVADIVELU)

CUSTOM HOUSE, CHENNAI-1.                 DY. COMMR. OF CUSTOMS (APPG.)

DATE : 24.05.2001

________________________________________________________________________

CIRCULAR NO.14/2001-CUS.V

F.NO.467/25/2000-CUS.V DATED 02.03.2001

 

            Kind attention is invited to the Board’s letter issued vide F.No.467/21/89-Cus-V, dated 14.8.1991, which states that ‘demurrage’ and ‘dispatch’ money may not form a part of assessable value.

 

2.                  The decision of the Board was based on the then prevailing practice and a general perception of the Conference of Collectors held in April, 1991 about the nature of demurrage charges and dispatch money, without specifically examining the implications of Rule 9 of the Customs Valuation Rules or the GATT Valuation Rules.

 

3.                  It was never the intention of the Board to “exempt” ship demurrage charges from customs duty. Besides, the aforesaid clarificatory letter proceeded on a premise that post-dispatch charges and ship demurrage are to be similarly treated in the matter of valuation of imported goods. Importers have, however, disregarded the letter in the matter of post-dispatch charges. Wherever there is reduction of freight charges, the benefit by way of reduction in the value of goods has been claimed by the importers and in certain cases their claims also upheld by the Appellate Authorities (upto the level of CEGAT) and some of these decisions have attained finality, although in one case an appeal is pending in the Supreme Court.

 

4.                  In the circumstances, it is considered advisable to clarify that nothing contained in the earlier letter should be construed as authorizing the exclusion of any ship demurrage charges paid which are required to be included in the assessable value of goods under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 interalia by virtue of Rule 9(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

 

The earlier letter dated 14.8.1991 referred in para 1 supra shall stand withdrawn.

 

 

*********************

Back to Main Index